Admin
Administrator
Posts: 377
|
Post by Admin on Aug 2, 2013 9:39:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cenydd on Aug 6, 2013 9:53:59 GMT
It seems like this company were guilty of a staggering lack of concern for the environment around their activities, even knowing its importance and protected status. 'never intended to harm' is a very long way from 'careful not to do harm', and 'disrespect' is something demonstrated by negligence and inaction as much as by action. It sounds to me like they've got off very lightly with that fine, although I don't know the size of the company and how much of a hit it is to them relatively.
|
|