|
Post by cenydd on Aug 12, 2013 10:40:22 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23653789Minimising losses should be a priority, of course, but there is always some risk in trying to help people in this kind of situation. That doesn't mean that it's too great a risk to take, or that it's not worth taking it. Although one batch of supplies has been lost, lots of other supplies have got through, and that is saving lives - for me that makes it worthwhile even if if doesn't always go to plan.
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Sept 5, 2013 12:30:46 GMT
My only objection is that taxpayers funded the foreign aid. I'm sure there are people in the UK that need assistance just like there are people in the US that need assistance and if anyone is to be helped by the government then it should be the people of the nation itself.
At the same time we, as individuals, should be compassionate with the plight of any people that need assistance. We can privately donate to help those in other countries that are in need of assistance. That is our "personal responsibility" but that is not a responsibility of our government. There are numerous ways that we can personally do this. Our government is about our nation and not other nations. So long as one person is going hungry in our nation that is a concern for our government. If the government wants to help someone then it needs to help the citizens of the nation it has authority over.
|
|