|
Post by cenydd on Sept 25, 2013 19:48:45 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-24273380This is quite staggering, and shocking at a fundamental level. Who is next - the Jews, perhaps? To have a government minister saying something like that should be deeply worrying to the decent people of France, and in fact for decent people everywhere.
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Oct 20, 2013 12:33:56 GMT
This reflects a generally held belief by many politicians as well by many individuals that the "People are the subjects of government" as opposed to the "government being the servant of the People" in many nations including the United States.
I would stand with Thomas Jefferson's belief that the person has in inalienable Right of Expatriation that allows them to leave their native country of birth and relocate (immigrate) to another nation. Thomas Jefferson also expressed concerns that "unlimited" immigration that is beyond the capacity of a nation to absorb could be problematic which could impose a limitation on the Freedom to Exercise the Right of Expatriation but such infringements upon the Freedom to Exercise a Right should always be to the least extent possible.
In the cases where someone has already immigrated and been absorbed into the population a nation should never have the authority to evict (deport) them regardless of what their social or political beliefs are so long as their actions do not harm others. This should obviously never be imposed based upon any attributes of the person such as race, religion, ethnic heritage, social class, or other invidious criteria. On the flip side a person that immigrates to a country solely for criminal purposes can and should be prosecuted and eventually deported because their Right of Expatriation does not allow them to commit criminal acts that violate the Inalienable Rights of another Person.
A "natural born citizen" (i.e. established by jus soli - the Right of Soil) can never have their citizenship revoked or be deported from the nation, ever, and always has a Right to Return to their native country of birth. The Right of the Person supersedes any authority of the government.
In short All People have a Right to Immigrate but not for criminal purposes. I believe that is a pretty straight-forward proposition that all nations should accept and defend.
|
|
|
Post by dangermouse on Oct 21, 2013 1:37:55 GMT
I suspect that he is overcompensating to defend against the encroaching far right. He wants to be seen as tough on immigration. The French as a whole support a harder line, and the student uprisings are more an objection to the abrupt method of deporting the young girl and her family, and not to the policy itself.
|
|