Admin
Administrator
Posts: 377
|
Post by Admin on Jul 25, 2013 14:25:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by 12th on Jul 26, 2013 22:37:08 GMT
It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a politician to enter the kingdom of God.
|
|
|
Post by smartmouthwoman on Jul 31, 2013 14:33:15 GMT
This guy is super creepy looking. Its amazing how much he and Weiner have in common. Both Democrats Both creepy looking Both have attractive wives Both admit wrong-doing, but refuse to step down. Appears we have a pattern here.
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Aug 3, 2013 12:07:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by 12th on Aug 3, 2013 20:46:02 GMT
Bad example. The link doesn't work and if you are talking about Kirsten Anderson, I can't find where she has ever named names. Look for a republican who was in a sex scandal and still in office.
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Aug 4, 2013 11:05:32 GMT
Bad example. The link doesn't work and if you are talking about Kirsten Anderson, I can't find where she has ever named names. Look for a republican who was in a sex scandal and still in office. Don't know why the link failed to work but that isn't the point. Sexual harassment is all too prevalent in the work place and to make it a partisan issue is really disrespectful to the victims of sexual harassment. Is the San Diego mayor a slime ball? Absolutely but he's not alone and the statistics are chilling. www.risman-law.com/2012/01/workplace-sexual-harassment-scary-stats/
|
|
|
Post by 12th on Aug 5, 2013 13:37:44 GMT
Couldn't find one? Srsly? You should be able to find one republican who has had a sex scandal who is still in office. Your point was that republicans do it too.
Calling democrats perverts is not disrespectful to the victims of sexual harassment. Reelecting them over and over IS. Thankfully, at least it looks like Weiner won't be mayor of the biggest city in the nation.
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Aug 5, 2013 15:52:03 GMT
Couldn't find one? Srsly? You should be able to find one republican who has had a sex scandal who is still in office. Your point was that republicans do it too. Calling democrats perverts is not disrespectful to the victims of sexual harassment. Reelecting them over and over IS. Thankfully, at least it looks like Weiner won't be mayor of the biggest city in the nation. No, my point was that sexual harassment crosses all political ideologies and to make it a partisan issue is most certainly disrespectful of the victims of sexual harassment. Are we to say that a Republican that sexually harasses a person is not a pervert just because they're a Republican. Is the claim being made that all Democrats are sexual perverts and no Republicans are perverts. Get serious please.
|
|
|
Post by smartmouthwoman on Aug 5, 2013 18:47:56 GMT
Couldn't find one? Srsly? You should be able to find one republican who has had a sex scandal who is still in office. Your point was that republicans do it too. Calling democrats perverts is not disrespectful to the victims of sexual harassment. Reelecting them over and over IS. Thankfully, at least it looks like Weiner won't be mayor of the biggest city in the nation. No, my point was that sexual harassment crosses all political ideologies and to make it a partisan issue is most certainly disrespectful of the victims of sexual harassment. Are we to say that a Republican that sexually harasses a person is not a pervert just because they're a Republican. Is the claim being made that all Democrats are sexual perverts and no Republicans are perverts. Get serious please. There are currently three Democrats under investigation or who have admitted sexual wrongdoing. To say the same is true of Republicans is a cop out to take the heat off Dems... without examples, it doesnt fly. The Filner guy started 2 weeks of rehab this morning. What you wanna bet he pinches his counselor on the ass? ROFLMAO .
|
|
|
Post by ShivaTD on Aug 5, 2013 19:05:52 GMT
With roughly 70% of all women experiencing sexual harassment by men of all political stripes I refuse to make this a partisan issue.
|
|
cubed
Scribbler
Consumate Snowball Artist
Posts: 9
Politics: Center/Left of Center.
|
Post by cubed on Aug 5, 2013 21:50:19 GMT
The Daily Show did an amazing piece on this retard. Guy needs to go stat. Thanks for the workplace Stats, more people need to be aware of how wrong this kind of behavior is.
|
|
|
Post by cenydd on Aug 6, 2013 9:34:38 GMT
more people need to be aware of how wrong this kind of behavior is. Exactly. There still seem to be some walks of life where a number of people haven't yet caught up with the fact that it is simply unacceptable. It isn't a partisan issue, but it is an issue for politics in general. I guess it isn't surprising that it's something that happens in politics (in all parties...every one of them, whether it gets publicity or is 'kept quiet' as such things so often are - I wouldn't let the fact that one party currently seems to be getting publicity over the issue and another isn't lull you into any kind of sense of security over it at all), because, like politics (for some politicians, at least) it is so much about 'power', and being in a position of 'power' and 'control' over other people. It's a sad but constant truth that many people are attracted to front line politics for exactly the wrong reasons. The person who most wants to be in that position of 'power' is usually the worst person to be there, but the reality is that cold, hard ambition usually (not always, but usually) wins over passionate personal dedication to a 'cause' and to serving the people to make things better - because of its very nature, ambition is better at creating the right kind of alliances, and better at manipulating opinion, and better at putting on a 'public face'. Power-hungriness doesn't always trump dedication entirely, of course, and some politicians genuinely have a decent mix of the two, but there are alot of people (especially in 'local' front line politics, because that is often easier to manipulate, and often has less competition between parties) who care far more about showing off how important they are (not to mention maximising the 'benefits' for themselves) than they do about the people they are supposed to serve. It's often particularly bad in 'safe' political areas, where one party is in a dominant position - those with their own ambitions know which party to join, and which line to repeat, and know that they only have to make the right friends within that party to gain real power for themselves. Areas without real political competition between parties (I live in such an area myself, and see the results of it both in terms of competence and in terms of the real calibre of many successful candidates) tend to become areas which are not well run, and where the people 'in charge' are not the kind of people who should be in that role at all. It doesn't matter which party it is at all, of course, and nobody should be complacent about that - those kind of people will join whichever one is dominant, and therefore most suitable for serving them and their personal ambitions. I don't know about the particular circumstances of these mentioned cases, of course, but those are often the kind of places where such things as this are most likely to go on, because of the kind of people who are in positions of 'power' and seeking 'control' over others. Unfortunately, by the nature of politics in such places, they are also the places where it's most likely that such things can be 'kept quiet for the greater good' (not only of 'the party', but sometimes of other prominent and/or dominant organisations within that society too - unfortunately alot of things get hushed up 'to avoid embarrassment' for various groups and organisations, and far too many of these people get away with doing such things, sometimes for many years). That certainly doesn't mean that it isn't happening, though.
|
|